Here’s another funny moment I came across when doing some research. In a larceny trial, the defendant argued entrapment.
“Swartz’ [sic] argument is that, because she had a known emotional attachment to the Camaro, placing it un front of the Patenaude’s house with a ‘for sale’ sign on it was an extraordinary temptation and inducement to commit the crime.” Swartz v. State, 971 P.2d 137, 140 (Wyo. 1998).
